Date

07-31

Comments

3

Multi-level marketing (MLM) is not for me thanks…

If you’re into MLM or similar network marketing, while I respect your interest, I’m not at all interested, and thank you for not pitching me, or trying to convince me.

Multi-level marketing (called network marketing by others), is a marketing strategy used by MLM companies in their business plan.

In order to understand the MLM business model it is necessary to understand how the movement of materials, information and funds across the MLM supply chain (distribution channel) is managed and coordinated.

A supply chain is an integrated network (each intermediary commonly called a “middle-man”) of retailers, distributors, transporters, storage facilities and suppliers that participate in the production, sale, and delivery of a particular product to the end customer.

When buying a product most consumers will want the best quality at the lowest cost, in the shortest lead-time, and “cutting out the middle man”, which translated means better value for money.   

The removal of intermediaries in a supply chain is called disintermediation and it seems logical that the closer in the supply chain the customer is to the manufacturer, the better the value for money received by the customer.  

Market transparency of the costs, functionality, competitive advantage, etc., of any product is essential for fulfilling the expectations and winning the confidence of customers, so why exactly would potential MLM customers choose an MLM product (over more traditional competition)?

The MLM network is structured to compensate members not only for the product sales they generate individually, but also for the sales of other members they have introduced to the company, creating a down-line of member distributors and a hierarchy of multiple levels (each adding a middle-man) of compensation (added costs). 

In an age when supply chains are becoming lean by eliminating waste, MLM adds intermediaries.

With added commissions, bonus payments, marketing materials, costs for free samples and demo equipment, administrative fees, membership, and other added “middle-man” costs, from the beginning of the MLM supply chain through the multi-levels to delivery, I’m apprehensive of any claimed advantage or benefit for a potential customer buying a MLM product.  

Members of most MLM’s must also be good recruiters and be able to recruit to profit from down-line sales.  

Like some retailers asking for a dollar donation at the cash register for a charitable, or socially responsible, cause (they support), some newer MLM companies are attempting to sell and recruit by appealing to the emotions of people through aligning their products to causes.

People join a MLM company believing that by recruiting members from their sphere of influence they will gain financially when in fact it often causes lost relationships and, after subtracting all business expenses, including product purchases from the company, the large majority of MLM members also lose money.

Personally I’m going to continue specifying and selecting products via the Internet, or shopping the more traditional way at a retail outlet if I want a product right away.

Before getting involved in a MLM company ask yourself where your paying customers will come from, and how you’ll be able to convince them of the value for money you are providing with your MLM product? 

How much money will you have to invest up front, how much time do you have to personally invest (your time has value so be honest with yourself), and more importantly, what will be the return on your investment (ROI)?

P.S.  A “Pyramid” scheme is the practice of receiving commissions directly from recruiting new members (vs. from the sales they generate) and is illegal.

Something to say? Leave a comment below!

3 Responses to “Multi-level marketing (MLM) is not for me thanks…”

  1. well said! we must think thousand times…
    why should I buy it from MLM? while I can buy it from the internet or from a convenient store.
    and it’s true, you can sense the “Pyramid scheme” dropping from the MLM’s! the strange thing is that the Pyramid is illegal activity, and the MLM is Legal a paradox!

  2. I understand your concerns. MLM have distribution and sales costs like any other and what people fail to take on when they undertake a business selling X is that it requires toil and good logistics to effect timely deliveries. Tupperware did well from it and Amway etc by taking on the delivery aspect. Therefore they actually manufacture and distribute, depending on sales from local networks. They are supposed to pass on savings from sales costs.

    The Body Shop passed on savings on packaging and guaranteed their products not tested on animals. They succeeded without MLM. People were saying they liked green and cheap.

    Different models vary. Google uses networks to place their ads on billions of sites and vary their levels according to a kind of stock market of keywords. This is an affiliate model where all afflitates get the same kickback.

    Discount for selling large numbers of items is a recognised model and where MLM copanies stick to their code then it works OK to have networked partners cutting down the sales costs to make a margin for their efforts.

    Where it all falls down is through the feeding frenzy as the company grows where people sell heads to the moguls. This is where it becomes uethical as it is based on as yet
    unearned income. That’s lending and borrowing on potential as I see it.

    So when a man gets a partner who also wants to sell X, instead of trading normally he sells his partner’s details to the mogul who builds a mighty list – so large that only a mogul with mogulmoney could service it.

    What starts as all nice and ideal becomes corrupted by the mogul’s hype parties at hotels where the introducer is promised an ongoing % on his name A and ALSO on multiple OTHER levels – so if name A brings in B who introduces C who sells like crazy. A and B peter out (as do most recruits) but C may represent ongoing cash for the introducer. It’s no more than a gamble depending on the people – rather than the merit of the product.

    MLM is not automatically set up like this. There are ethical ones where a deal is a deal on commission while the responsibility for selling is based on the same basis as Google. X sales (or clicks) = X $.

    There are many housewives who have catalogues and goods that their family, friends and neighbours buy from. There’s nothing wrong with that.

    One more point in favour of MLM is that some products could sell no other way. Some companies have genuinely fabulous products that they want to sell in a market entirely dominated by a large [say]chemical compamy.

    That would be like selling real seeds to government agengies who buy wacky seeds off monsanto on long term trade agreements.

    So fair trade network marketing can exist – I think it’s the ML of the MLM that causes the list manufacturers to feed so voraciously. A lot of ‘Next big things’ never get further than the building of a dam good list of ‘people who want to …..’ Others get blown out of the water early on by infiltators from the competition.

    And to quote Christopher Robin ‘..and so it goes tiddly pom’

    I just wanted to say – sometimes a product sold ‘apparently’ via MLM is innocent of the headhunters and you can be appraised of something that is really really good and you could well do with.

    Yes it’s a jungle we are in – no doubt – however within a jungle you can get amazing things too. It’s a matter of doing the homework and keeping your hand on the rudder of common sense. What looks like a snake – may be harmless with teeth that only want to chew dinner.

    Warm regards…

    Jackie

  3. One of the largest companies in the UK (in the FTSE 250) only uses Network Marketing to provide the cheapest utilities (phone, energy, etc). They do not advertise (passing the savings to customers) and continuously win awards in the UK for best value and customer services.

    They are also known for their ethical principles and even have a fund raising mechanism for charities and other volunteer organisations based on the same principles.

    Distributors have to undergo training and do not have to carry or buy any products – all they do is to introduce customers.

    So, not all Network Marketing companies are the same.

    Best wishes

    Paulo